top of page

The Maastricht Diplomat

MD-fulltext-logo.png
  • 1200px-Facebook_f_logo_(2019).svg
  • Instagram_logo_2016.svg

New Bus Line for the Jewish Community in London: Protection or Division?


What Happened and Why? 

In London, a new bus line dedicated to members of the Jewish community was inaugurated this September, connecting the neighborhoods of Stamford Hill and Golders Green, both known for their significant Jewish populations. This initiative, introduced by Sadiq Khan, the mayor of London, will operate seven days a week from 7 a.m. to 9 p.m. and was part of Khan's commitments during his reelection campaign. This measure aims to address the rise in antisemitic acts of violence in London and globally, nearly one year after October 7th. However, it also raises broader ethical questions about how to tackle such issues.

 

The creation of this bus line is a direct response to a 15-year-old and ongoing request from the Jewish community in London, which has faced a notable increase in antisemitic incidents. Following October 7th, the violent situation in Gaza and the subsequent global protests in support of Palestinians intensified tensions and anti-Israeli demonstrations worldwide, including in London. Reports indicate a 278,9% rise in antisemitic acts since the conflict began. 

 

In response to this situation, local authorities have implemented the bus line as a one-year experimental measure designed to enhance the security of Jewish commuters and provide them with a safer space. In a BBC interview, Sadiq Khan emphasized that this initiative is a direct response to the growing fear experienced by the Jewish community in London.

 

“They were frightened because of a massive increase of antisemitism since October 7 last year” Sadiq Khan, BBC London.

 

With this measure, we can notice the British pragmatism in decision-making, seeking to address immediate security concerns while acknowledging the current tensions. 

Some could also argue that this measure was taken because of electoral reason as Sadiq Khan was campaigning for his 3rdmandate when making the promise for the bus, traducing his wish to gain the Jewish’s community’s trust for the elections. 

 

What’s being said? 

The decision has generated a range of reactions. Leaders of the Jewish community have expressed relief and gratitude, viewing the measure as crucial for their physical security.


“In a period where our community is encountering unprecedented antisemitism, any measure that bolsters the confidence of Jewish individuals in using public transport is immensely valued.”

Adrian Cohen, Vice President of the Board of Deputies. 


 Conversely, some critics question the implications of such a measure. Could the bus line be seen as a form of exclusion, segregating the Jewish community from public spaces? Can the solution be counter-productive where buses would be seen as a target for those having bad intentions towards the Jews? How are the bus drivers going to identify if a person is Jewish? Some argue that the implementation of this measure could lead to an unintended consequence: if antisemitic incidents were to occur even within these designated areas, critics might claim that Jews should have remained within their own communities. This could result in a dangerous narrative suggesting that Jews are to blame for exposing themselves to violence by venturing beyond their designated safe spaces.

 

Reactions on social media also reflect this uncertainty. Some users describe the measure as "shocking" and lament that such a separation is necessary to ensure the safety of a particular group. Comments from figures like Michael Dickson (Executive Director of ‘StandWithUs’ on X), criticize the use of a segregated bus system as an indicator of the severity of antisemitic hatred, highlighting the complexity of the ongoing debate: 

 

“If anti-Jewish hate is so bad that you have to resort to a separate bus system to keep Jews physically safe, you have a serious problem”.

Michael Dickson, X. 

 

Historical comparisons have also been drawn. Critics argue that establishing a dedicated bus line could evoke disturbing reminders of past segregationist policies, referring to Hitlerian regime. However, it is important to recognize that the current situation is fundamentally different from  historical authoritarian regimes, as the intention behind this measure is to provide security and protection, not to discriminate. 


What’s at stake? 

In response to critics, BBC London clarified that the 310-bus line is not exclusively for Jewish citizens but is open to all passengers. However, the route specifically connects two predominantly Jewish areas, providing a direct link so that Jewish commuters can avoid switching buses in areas they may feel unsafe in. This route adjustment specifically follows several reports of assaults on Jewish individuals in these neighborhoods, particularly after the events of October 7, 2023.

 

While this clarification addresses concerns about passenger identification based on religion, it still raises broader questions about the British government’s response to the rise in antisemitic incidents in London since October 7. Some argue that instead of addressing the root causes of the issue, the government has applied a temporary fix, or “band-aid solution,” rather than trying to pursue long-term strategies to combat antisemitism more effectively. 

 

This case shows the complexities surrounding the ongoing conflict in Gaza. During the protests in Maastricht last spring, some Jewish students expressed concerns about feeling threatened by the demonstrations, which led to constructive discussions between Jewish student associations and protest organizers to ensure the movement remained peaceful. These conversations highlighted the balance between advocating for a cause and ensuring that this advocacy does not foster hostility towards others. This way, the protests served as a reminder of the importance of open dialogue in navigating sensitive global issues and keep a pacific conversation. 


Overall, this initiative is an example of how local authorities are attempting to respond to a concerning rise in antisemitism even if the measure raises significant questions about segregation and integration. While the measure is broadly welcomed by those directly affected for its protective benefits, some see it as counter-productive in the fight for antisemitism violence. However, for now, nothing is set in stone, the measure is only a year-long experiment. Local authorities have committed to assessing the satisfaction of bus line users throughout the year and will adjust it as necessary for a possible future continuation of the measure. 

Comments


Email Address: journal@myunsa.org

Copyright 2020 UNSA | All rights reserved UNSA

powered-by-unsa.png
bottom of page